User Community Feedback

Submitted ideas will be evaluated by our product teams for upcoming releases and will be responded to so you know where things stand. For product support, please use the community forums or contact TAC.

NOTE: All Cisco employees & Channel Partners must enter Ideas through this Ideas Portal.

Webex App in CUCM Registered Mode, Voicemail integrate does not allow you to forward a voicemail like Jabber did

Today Jabber in the voicemail integration allows a user to right click on a voicemail and forward or reply to that voicemail. The Webex App in CUCM calling mode integrated to UCXN does not allow for this. All other options are there but forward/reply.

  • Guest
  • Jan 27 2022
  • Planned
  • Guest commented
    15 Mar 02:12pm

    Any update on this? It's now middle of March and no movement on this still.

  • Guest commented
    18 Jan 08:57pm

    It is now 1/18/2023 - Still not available. I am so tired of Cisco promising things and then not delivering. In a time where MS Teams is making inroads on Webex clients, I would think Cisco would be interested in keeping their install base happy. Come on folks, this was available in Jabber! How about giving your customers what they need instead of what you think we "might" want.

  • Guest commented
    13 Sep, 2022 01:16pm

    There are a couple of entries for this same request so the total number of requests to engineering is not being properly represented. There are quite a few people who are asking for this and the request is YEARS old with a plethora of sites and information on this request. How has this this not been addressed yet? If feedback channels are listened to then this should have some roadmap entry after 2+ years of being requested by the user community.


  • Guest commented
    6 Sep, 2022 02:57pm

    Voicemail may be dying off... but the few times you get an important one, you often need to forward it. This feature is important.

  • Guest commented
    10 Mar, 2022 04:55pm

    This looks similar or identical to the feature request WXCUST-I-1927. That one is marked as "Planned" In the comments for that feature request there is a comment from an Admin indicating this feature was expected "within this year" and the comment was posted in 2021. We are here at the end of Q1 in 2022 and still no feature. Is this still planned?

  • Guest commented
    27 Jan, 2022 03:24pm

    absolutely. feature parity is necessary, even for those features that are only used by a small percentage of users.